Skip to main content
WUHLD
← Back to articles

How to Remove an Executor of a Will in the UK

· 35 min

Note: The following scenario is fictional and used for illustration.

Emma Richardson, 46, was named as a beneficiary of her mother's £420,000 estate 18 months ago. Her brother David, appointed as sole executor, has since refused to respond to Emma's emails and calls for eight months. Without informing Emma or the other beneficiaries, David sold their mother's £280,000 house and deposited the proceeds into an account Emma cannot access. He hasn't filed for probate despite repeated requests, and the family rift has deepened as Emma suspects David is misappropriating funds.

Emma feels powerless and betrayed. She doesn't know if she can legally force David to act properly or remove him entirely.

According to Dutton Gregory Solicitors, 31.2% of contentious probate disputes involve executor issues, making it the most common category of inheritance disputes in the UK. This article explains the legal grounds for removing a problematic executor, the court application process under Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985, costs involved, alternatives like voluntary resignation, and how to protect your own estate from executor disputes.

Table of Contents

Can You Remove an Executor of a Will in the UK?

Yes, executors can be removed in the UK, but the process varies dramatically depending on whether probate has been granted and whether the executor cooperates. This article covers executor removal in England and Wales under Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985. Different rules apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Three pathways exist for executor removal, each with different complexity and costs.

Voluntary resignation is the simplest option. If the executor signs a Deed of Renunciation before probate, the process costs between £0 and £500. The executor permanently gives up their role, and an alternate executor takes over.

Citation procedure applies when an executor refuses to act or has intermeddled without obtaining a grant. This involves moderate complexity with court involvement but costs significantly less than full court proceedings.

Court removal under Section 50 is the most complex pathway. After probate has been granted, only the High Court can remove an executor. This process typically costs between £10,000 and £30,000 plus VAT and takes 6 to 12 months.

The key distinction is timing. Before probate, removal is relatively straightforward. After the grant has been issued, removal becomes much harder. Courts hesitate to override the deceased's choice of executor without compelling evidence that continuation in office harms beneficiaries.

According to Which?, 87 executor removal cases were filed in the High Court of England and Wales in 2024, up from 72 in 2022. The rise reflects increasing estate values, complex family situations, and lack of oversight.

Who can apply for removal? Beneficiaries, co-executors, and anyone with an interest in the estate can petition the court. However, having standing to apply doesn't guarantee success. Courts require valid legal grounds and compelling evidence.

Sarah was named executor of her aunt's estate but lives in Australia and doesn't want the responsibility. She signs Form PA15 (Deed of Renunciation) and files it with the Probate Registry. The alternate executor takes over. Cost: £0.

James obtained probate for his father's £600,000 estate but then sold the family home without consulting his siblings and deposited funds in his personal account. His sister applied to the High Court under Section 50. Cost: £22,000 in legal fees. James was removed and replaced with a professional administrator.

While removal is possible, the legal grounds must be substantial. Let's examine what constitutes valid grounds for executor removal.

Courts require compelling evidence that the executor's continuation is detrimental to beneficiaries' welfare. Under Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985, the High Court has discretionary power to remove executors, but this power is exercised cautiously.

Seven valid grounds exist, each requiring specific evidence and meeting a high threshold.

Criminal record or conviction raises serious doubts about an executor's ability to manage estate assets honestly. If an executor has been convicted of fraud, embezzlement, theft, or similar financial crimes, courts view this as evidence of unfitness.

An executor convicted of financial fraud in a separate case prompted beneficiaries to argue this demonstrated unfitness to manage a £300,000 estate. The court agreed and removed the executor.

Physical or mental incapacity prevents an executor from fulfilling their duties. Courts accept medical evidence showing dementia, severe illness, or lack of mental capacity as grounds for removal.

An executor diagnosed with advanced dementia couldn't make financial decisions. A GP report confirmed the inability to handle estate matters. The court appointed a substitute executor from a trust corporation.

Fraud, dishonesty, or self-dealing constitutes the most serious misconduct. This includes falsifying documents, stealing estate funds, or using estate assets for personal benefit.

An executor moved into the deceased's property rent-free, sold valuable artwork to himself below market value, and claimed inflated expenses. The court removed the executor and ordered repayment of misappropriated funds.

Failure to communicate with beneficiaries breaches the executor's fiduciary duty. Executors have a legal obligation to keep beneficiaries reasonably informed about estate administration progress.

An executor ignored 15 emails over nine months, provided no estate accounts, and didn't respond to solicitor's letters. The court removed the executor for failing basic fiduciary duties.

Disobeying court orders demonstrates contempt and justifies removal. If a court orders an executor to provide estate accounts or comply with specific directives, refusal to comply is grounds for removal.

A court ordered an executor to provide full estate accounts within 28 days. The executor failed to comply three times. The court removed the executor for contempt.

Conflict of interest occurs when the executor's personal interests compete with estate interests. This includes situations where the executor is a creditor of the estate, a business partner of a beneficiary, or has competing financial interests.

An executor owned 50% of the deceased's business. His decisions about the business sale benefited him personally. The court found an irreconcilable conflict and appointed an independent administrator.

Hostility and breakdown of relationship alone isn't sufficient. Courts only remove executors when hostility materially affects estate administration. The case of Haynes v Andre [2018] EWHC 489 (Ch) established that there must be a material risk that hostility will adversely affect administration.

What courts don't accept as valid grounds matters as much as what they do accept.

Simple disagreements with beneficiaries don't justify removal. Minor delays or administrative inefficiencies are insufficient. Beneficiaries preferring a different person as executor isn't grounds for removal. Personality complaints without evidence of estate harm won't succeed.

Lane v Lane [2024] EWHC 275 (Ch) established the governing principle: "The touchstone under section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act is what is in the interests of the beneficiaries of the estate as a whole."

Understanding valid grounds is essential, but timing matters just as much. Let's look at when executors can and cannot be removed.

When Executors Can Be Removed (and When They Can't)

Critical timing issues determine whether executor removal is possible. The stage of estate administration dramatically affects your options and costs.

Before probate application represents the easiest removal pathway. At this stage, an executor can voluntarily renounce via Deed of Renunciation using Form PA15. However, a critical restriction applies: executors cannot renounce if they've already intermeddled in the estate.

Intermeddling means acting as executor without obtaining a grant. Selling assets, paying debts, collecting money owed to the deceased, or carrying on the deceased's business all constitute intermeddling. Once an executor intermeddles, they become an "executor de son tort" and cannot renounce. They're stuck with the liability.

Safe harbour actions that don't constitute intermeddling include arranging and paying for the funeral, making urgent repairs to property, insuring assets, and gathering estate information. These protective actions allow executors to preserve estate assets without triggering intermeddling rules.

Probate application filed but grant not yet issued creates moderate difficulty. The citation procedure can be used if an executor refuses to act. The "power reserved" option allows an executor to step aside but potentially return later. Courts can order executors to take the grant or renounce.

After grant of probate issued represents the most difficult scenario. Executors cannot renounce after obtaining the grant. The only option is a Section 50 application to the High Court. The Probate Registry has limited power to revoke grants but doesn't exercise this power lightly. Special circumstances and agreement of all personal representatives are required.

Scenarios where removal is blocked include situations where the executor already obtained the grant and beneficiaries have only minor complaints. No evidence of misconduct, just personality conflicts, won't succeed. Minor delays that don't materially affect the estate aren't sufficient grounds. Executors following the testator's specific wishes, even if beneficiaries disagree, typically remain in office.

Scenarios where removal is likely include clear evidence of fraud or theft, complete breakdown in estate administration lasting five or more years for a simple estate with no progress, medical evidence of incapacity, irreconcilable conflicts of interest, and serious breaches of fiduciary duty.

Nwosu v Nwosu [2018] EWHC 1520 (Ch) illustrates court intervention for deadlock. The relatively straightforward estate took over five years with no progress. The executors couldn't agree on anything. The court removed both executors and appointed an independent third party.

The legal framework for executor removal is Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985. Here's how it works.

Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 provides the primary legal mechanism for executor removal in England and Wales.

The statute grants the High Court discretionary power to appoint a substituted personal representative to act in place of existing executors, or to terminate the appointment of one or more executors when there are two or more serving.

Who can apply under Section 50? Personal representatives of the estate, beneficiaries, anyone acting on behalf of a personal representative or beneficiary, and co-executors seeking removal of a problematic co-executor all have standing.

The court's discretion is wide. Removal isn't automatic even with valid grounds. The court must balance the testator's wishes—remembering the deceased chose this executor—against the welfare of beneficiaries, which is the primary consideration. The seriousness of the executor's conduct and whether removal will improve estate administration also factor into the decision.

Governing procedure requires following Civil Procedure Rules Part 57.13 and Practice Direction 57. All applications must be brought in the High Court, not County Court. The Chancery Division handles all executor removal cases. All personal representatives must be joined as parties to the claim.

At the hearing, the executor must produce the grant of probate to the court. Evidence is heard via affidavit and witness statements. The court makes a discretionary decision based on beneficiaries' welfare.

If a removal order is made, the grant and sealed copy of the order go to the Principal Registry of the Family Division. A memorandum of the order is endorsed on or annexed to the grant. If an executor is removed before the grant issues, a sealed copy goes to the Principal Registry for recording.

The court's power to appoint a substitute includes appointing a judicial trustee under the Judicial Trustees Act 1896. Courts can authorise substitute executors to charge remuneration on terms the court considers appropriate. Often, courts appoint professional administrators—solicitors or trust corporations—when all original parties are removed.

The historical foundation for these principles comes from Letterstedt v Broers (1884) 9 App Cas 371, a trustee removal case. The guiding principle established remains: the welfare of the beneficiaries.

Section 50 provides the legal power, but how does the court application process actually work? Here's the step-by-step procedure.

The Court Application Process: Step-by-Step Guide

Section 50 applications follow a structured procedure with mandatory pre-action steps before court involvement.

Write to the executor as the first formal step. Send a letter setting out specific concerns about their conduct, examples of breaches of duty, a request for explanation, and an opportunity to remedy the situation. For example, require provision of estate accounts within 14 days. Warn that court action will follow if issues remain unresolved. Keep copies of all correspondence as evidence for court. Use recorded delivery or email with read receipts.

Attempt to resolve without court because courts expect parties to try mediation, negotiation, or alternative dispute resolution first. Courts view litigation as a last resort. Document all attempts to resolve, as the court will ask about pre-action steps. Typical timeline: four to eight weeks for negotiation attempts.

Consider citation procedure first if the executor simply refuses to act with no grant obtained. Citation may be cheaper than a Section 50 application. The citation process costs significantly less and resolves faster.

Seek legal advice because Section 50 applications are complex. DIY applications aren't recommended. A solicitor will assess the strength of your case and provide a cost estimate, typically £5,000 to £30,000 or more depending on complexity.

After pre-action steps, the formal court application begins.

Prepare a Part 8 claim form because Section 50 applications use Part 8 claims, not Part 7. Part 8 is used for applications where no substantial dispute of fact is expected. The claim form must include names and addresses of all parties, details of the estate and grant if issued, legal grounds for removal specifying which grounds apply, an evidence summary, and relief sought including removing the executor, appointing a substitute, and costs.

Prepare supporting evidence through a witness statement or affidavit setting out background to the estate, the executor's conduct giving rise to the application, specific examples with dates, amounts, and correspondence, impact on beneficiaries, and why removal serves beneficiaries' best interests. Supporting documents include the grant of probate if issued, the deceased's will, correspondence with the executor, estate accounts if available, and expert reports such as medical capacity assessments or forensic accounting.

Issue the claim at the High Court by filing in the Chancery Division. Court fees vary based on estate value, typically £500 to £1,000 or more. A judge is assigned to the claim.

Serve all parties within typically 14 days of issue. You must serve the executor or executors being removed, all other personal representatives, and major beneficiaries if the court requires.

Await response as the executor has 14 days to acknowledge service. The executor may agree to step down, leading to a consent order and case resolution. The executor may oppose removal, causing the case to proceed to hearing. The executor may ignore the claim, allowing the court to proceed in their absence.

Attend the hearing if contested. Courts typically list cases for hearing three to six months after filing, depending on court availability and complexity. Evidence is heard via affidavit and witness statements. Oral testimony is rare. Legal argument focuses on whether Section 50 criteria are met. The court issues its decision in a judgment.

Obtain the court order if removal is granted. The order removes the executor and appoints a substitute if applicable. A costs order determines who pays. The grant and sealed order go to the Principal Registry. If removal is denied, the executor continues in office and the applicant typically pays costs.

Timeline summary: pre-action takes one to two months, claim preparation requires two to four weeks, service and response takes one month, and hearing waiting time spans three to six months. Total time is typically six to 12 months.

The court process is lengthy and expensive. Let's look at typical costs involved.

How Much Does It Cost to Remove an Executor?

Executor removal costs vary dramatically based on whether the removal is voluntary, uncontested, or contested. Understanding cost ranges helps you evaluate whether removal is worth pursuing.

Voluntary resignation is the cheapest option. If the executor agrees to step down via Deed of Renunciation using Form PA15, costs range from £0 to £500. Form PA15 is free to download from gov.uk. Optional solicitor assistance to draft the deed costs £200 to £500. Filing with the Probate Registry is free. Timeline: one to two weeks.

Uncontested court application applies when the executor doesn't oppose removal or consents or doesn't respond. Costs range from £5,000 to £10,000 plus VAT. Court fees cost £500 to £1,000. Solicitor fees run £4,000 to £9,000. Disbursements add £500 to £1,000. Timeline: three to six months.

Contested court application with straightforward issues occurs when the executor opposes but legal issues are relatively simple. Costs range from £10,000 to £20,000 plus VAT. Court fees cost £500 to £1,000. Solicitor fees run £9,000 to £18,000. Barrister fees if needed add £3,000 to £8,000. Disbursements cost £1,000 to £2,000. Timeline: six to 12 months.

Contested court application with complex issues involves extensive evidence, multiple executors, high-value estates, and extensive documentation. Costs range from £20,000 to £30,000 or more plus VAT. Court fees cost £1,000 to £2,000. Solicitor fees run £15,000 to £25,000. Barrister fees cost £5,000 to £15,000. Expert witnesses such as forensic accountants or medical experts add £2,000 to £10,000. Disbursements cost £2,000 to £5,000. Timeline: 12 to 24 months.

According to legal sources, typical cost estimates for court applications range between £10,000 and £30,000 plus VAT, though particularly contentious cases can exceed this.

Who pays these costs matters as much as the amounts themselves.

The general rule follows the "loser pays" principle. If you win the removal application, the executor is usually ordered to pay your costs from their personal funds, not the estate. If you lose the removal application, you pay both your costs and the executor's costs.

Exceptions exist where courts order costs paid from the estate. This happens when removal serves the estate's best interests but no wrongdoing is found, when executor conduct caused uncertainty requiring court resolution, or when both parties acted reasonably in bringing or defending the claim.

An executor with capacity issues may need removal through no fault of their own. In such cases, costs come from the estate rather than penalising the incapacitated executor personally.

Factors affecting costs include estate complexity with international assets or business interests, volume of evidence required, number of executors and beneficiaries involved, whether mediation was attempted, and court availability, as delays increase costs.

Cost reduction strategies include attempting mediation before court, which costs £2,000 to £5,000 versus £20,000 or more for litigation. Requesting "power reserved" instead of removal may work if the executor cooperates. Using citation procedure for inactive executors costs less than Section 50 applications. Consider whether the cost of removal exceeds the harm from the executor continuing.

Given these costs, many executors choose to step down voluntarily when approached. Here's how voluntary resignation works.

When an Executor Steps Down Voluntarily

Three options exist for voluntary executor resignation, each with different permanence and implications.

Deed of Renunciation provides permanent resignation. This formal legal document allows an executor to give up their role and all responsibilities permanently. Also called "renouncing probate," once filed, renunciation is irrevocable. The executor cannot change their mind later.

How it works: The executor completes Form PA15, titled "Give up probate executor or administrator rights," available from gov.uk. The form must be signed by the executor, witnessed by an independent witness who cannot be a beneficiary or related executor, and filed with the Probate Registry. Other executors file it when applying for the grant, or the renouncing executor can file it themselves.

The effect is complete. The executor has no right to apply for a grant in future. No personal responsibility exists if estate administration goes wrong later. The executor cannot step back in even if problems arise.

Critical restrictions apply. Executors cannot renounce if they've already intermeddled in the estate. Executors cannot renounce after a grant of probate has been issued to them. Intermeddling examples include selling property, paying debts, collecting money owed to the deceased, or carrying on the deceased's business.

Robert was named executor of his uncle's estate but lives in Canada and doesn't want the responsibility. He hasn't touched any estate assets. Robert completes Form PA15, has it witnessed, and sends it to the Probate Registry. His co-executor proceeds alone. Cost: £0.

Power Reserved allows temporary stepping back. An executor steps back initially but reserves the right to participate later. This keeps the door open to act if needed.

How it works: Other executors serve a Notice of Power Reserved on the non-acting executor. The notice states: "We plan to act without you; if you have no objection, you don't need to do anything." The non-acting executor doesn't need to actively consent. No court involvement is required.

The effect preserves options. Other executors proceed without the reserved executor. The reserved executor can step in later if needed, such as if the active executor becomes incapacitated. The reserved executor isn't named on the grant of probate initially.

When to use power reserved: when an executor is temporarily unavailable due to living abroad or serious illness, wants to see how estate administration proceeds before committing, or has an uncertain relationship with co-executors.

Linda and her brother Mark were named co-executors of their father's estate. Linda is undergoing cancer treatment and can't actively participate but wants to stay informed. Mark serves a Notice of Power Reserved on Linda. Mark proceeds with probate alone. If Linda recovers, she can step in later if needed.

Delegation via Attorney Grant allows executors to accept appointment but delegate duties to someone else. An attorney acts on the executor's behalf.

How it works: The executor creates a Power of Attorney appointing an attorney. The attorney applies for a grant in the attorney's name. The executor retains ultimate responsibility, but the attorney handles day-to-day administration.

The effect is revocable. Unlike renunciation, delegation can be revoked at any time. The executor remains legally responsible. This option proves useful for executors with time constraints but who want control.

When to use attorney delegation: when an executor lives abroad but wants to retain the role, when an executor lacks expertise but trusts a professional to handle details, or for temporary delegation during periods of unavailability.

A comparison helps clarify the options:

Renunciation is permanent, doesn't allow return, eliminates liability after filing, and works best for those who don't want the role at all.

Power Reserved is temporary, allows return later, creates limited liability only if stepping in, and suits those who are unsure or temporarily unavailable.

Attorney Grant is revocable, allows return by revoking the attorney, maintains full executor responsibility, and works for those wanting control but lacking time or expertise.

If an executor refuses to resign voluntarily, the citation procedure offers a non-contentious alternative to court applications.

The Citation Procedure: Forcing an Inactive Executor to Act

Citation is a non-contentious probate procedure governed by the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987. It provides a cheaper, faster alternative to Section 50 applications when an executor refuses to act.

Citation applies when an executor refuses to apply for probate, doing nothing, or has intermeddled but won't take the grant, acting without authority. This procedure costs significantly less than a full court application.

Two types of citation exist, each addressing different situations.

Citation to Accept or Refuse a Grant applies when an executor named in the will refuses to act but hasn't intermeddled. You want to force them to make a decision: accept the role or renounce.

Who can issue this citation? Any person who would be entitled to a grant if the executor renounced, or co-executors with power reserved.

The process involves preparing a citation document, serving it on the inactive executor, giving the executor a deadline to respond, typically 14 to 28 days, and requiring the executor to either accept the grant and apply for probate or renounce formally.

If the executor doesn't respond, their rights as executor "wholly cease" under Administration of Estates Act 1925 Section 5. Representation devolves to the next entitled person. The Registrar makes a note on the grant that the executor was cited and didn't appear. The cited executor can never apply for probate in future.

Michael was named executor of his friend's estate but ignored all contact for 10 months. He hasn't touched any assets. A beneficiary issues a citation to accept or refuse. Michael doesn't respond within 28 days. His rights as executor cease. The alternate executor applies for probate. Cost: £1,500 in solicitor fees versus £15,000 for a Section 50 application.

Citation to Take a Grant applies to intermeddlers. This type applies when an executor has intermeddled in the estate by selling assets, paying debts, or collecting money, the executor refuses to apply for a grant of probate, and at least six months have passed since death.

Who can issue this citation? Any person interested in the estate, including beneficiaries, creditors, and co-executors.

The process requires gathering evidence of intermeddling such as bank statements, receipts, or correspondence showing the executor acted as if they had authority. Issue a citation calling on the executor to show cause why they shouldn't be ordered to take the grant. Serve the citation on the executor. If the executor doesn't respond, the court orders the executor to take the grant. They're stuck with the role. If the executor refuses the court order, they face contempt of court with potential fines or imprisonment.

The effect forces the intermeddling executor to take responsibility. The executor becomes liable for estate administration and cannot walk away from liability for actions already taken.

Jane sold her mother's car for £8,000 and deposited proceeds in her own account before applying for probate. Beneficiaries issue a citation to take a grant. Jane is forced to apply for probate and account for the £8,000. She cannot renounce because she intermeddled.

Comparing citation to Section 50 applications shows clear advantages. Citation costs £1,500 to £5,000 versus £10,000 to £30,000 or more for Section 50. Timeline is two to four months versus six to 12 months. Citation goes through the Probate Registry versus the High Court Chancery Division. Citation is available before grant or when the executor is inactive, while Section 50 applies after grant or when the executor is active but problematic. Complexity is lower for citation.

Limitations exist. Citation only works if probate hasn't yet been granted. Once an executor has the grant, you must use a Section 50 application. Citation cannot be issued while will validity proceedings are pending.

Courts have removed executors in numerous cases. Let's examine real-world examples from UK case law.

Case Law Examples: When Courts Remove Executors

Real UK cases illustrate when courts do and don't remove executors, providing concrete examples of Section 50 applications in practice.

Cases where courts removed executors demonstrate successful applications.

Lane v Lane [2024] EWHC 275 (Ch) involved an executor who engaged in poor conduct over an extended period. The executor failed to communicate with beneficiaries, made decisions favouring himself, and acted with hostility toward co-beneficiaries. The court removed the executor and appointed an independent professional administrator. The key quote: "The touchstone under section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act is what is in the interests of the beneficiaries of the estate as a whole." The lesson: multiple instances of poor conduct plus failure to act in beneficiaries' best interests equals removal.

Nwosu v Nwosu [2018] EWHC 1520 (Ch) involved a relatively straightforward estate with administration ongoing for over five years. The executors couldn't agree on how to proceed, creating complete deadlock preventing any progress. The court removed both conflicting executors and appointed an independent third party. The lesson: even without wrongdoing, protracted deadlock harming the estate justifies removal.

Hudman v Morris [2021] involved an executor who exhibited irrational and hostile conduct, putting personal views above estate interests with irrational decision-making. The court removed the executor. The lesson: personal agenda overriding fiduciary duty warrants removal.

Goodman v Goodman [2013] EWHC 758 (Ch) involved an application to remove a named executor before the grant issued. The court questioned Section 50 scope: can it be used before grant? The court confirmed Section 50 can remove named executors before probate is granted. The lesson: this expanded the scope of Section 50 beyond just post-grant removals.

Cases where courts refused to remove executors illustrate unsuccessful applications.

Haynes v Andre [2018] EWHC 489 (Ch) involved hostility between executors and beneficiaries. Beneficiaries didn't like the executor. Personal conflict existed but no evidence of estate harm. The court refused removal. The principle: "Hostility between executors or between executors and beneficiaries will not be enough of a reason for removal on its own. There must be a material risk that the hostility will adversely affect the administration of the estate." The lesson: personality conflicts alone are insufficient. You must show harm to the estate.

Khan v Crossland involved beneficiaries collectively opposing the testator's choice of executor. All beneficiaries wanted a different executor, creating tension between testator's wishes and beneficiaries' preferences. The court found that its discretion under Senior Courts Act 1981 Section 116 is wide, but the testator's choice is a relevant factor that must be weighed. The lesson: courts respect testator's wishes. Beneficiary preference alone is insufficient.

Long v Rodman [2019] EWHC 753 (Ch) involved complaints against an administrator requiring investigation. Chief Master Marsh stated: "It is not the role of the court on hearing an application under section 50 necessarily to make findings of wrongdoing. It is clear however, that where the beneficiaries are able to make out complaints that warrant further investigation, the continued tenure of the administrator becomes untenable unless the complaints are trivial." The lesson: serious complaints warranting investigation can justify removal even without proven wrongdoing.

The historical foundation comes from Letterstedt v Broers (1884) 9 App Cas 371, a landmark case on removing trustees with principles adapted to executors. Lord Blackburn's principle: "The paramount and guiding principle is whether the estate can be properly administered" and "the welfare of the beneficiaries." All modern cases reference this foundational principle.

Common patterns emerge in successful removal cases. Clear evidence of misconduct such as fraud, self-dealing, or failure to communicate leads to removal. Demonstrable harm to beneficiaries or the estate matters. Protracted delays with no justification warrant intervention. Irreconcilable conflicts preventing administration require resolution. Breach of fiduciary duties justifies removal.

Common patterns in failed removal cases show what doesn't work. Mere disagreements or personality conflicts aren't enough. Beneficiaries' preference for a different executor without other grounds fails. Minor delays or administrative inefficiencies don't justify removal. Complaints that are trivial or don't affect estate welfare won't succeed. Insufficient evidence to support allegations leads to rejection.

Understanding executor removal helps you make better choices for your own estate. Here's how to prevent executor problems in your will.

How to Protect Your Own Estate from Executor Problems

Lessons from executor removal cases teach proactive strategies for choosing executors wisely and avoiding disputes.

Choose executors with care by recognising red flags and seeking green flags.

Red flags to avoid include history of financial irresponsibility, criminal convictions for fraud or dishonesty, ongoing conflicts with family members who are beneficiaries, creditors of your estate or business partners with competing interests, and advanced age or declining health that may affect capacity when needed.

Green flags to seek include being organised, detail-oriented, and financially literate, being a good communicator who gets along with beneficiaries, being geographically accessible with UK-based preferred, being younger than you and likely to outlive you, and having no conflicts of interest with estate or beneficiaries.

Appoint multiple executors with clear roles because joint executors provide checks and balances. Specify whether executors must act jointly or can act independently.

"Joint" executors must all agree on decisions. This prevents a single executor going rogue but risks deadlock.

"Joint and several" executors can act independently. This option is faster but provides less oversight.

Consider two to three executors. More than that creates delays.

Michael appoints his two adult children as joint executors. Neither can sell property or distribute funds without the other's agreement. This prevents either from acting improperly but requires cooperation.

Name substitute or backup executors because if your primary executor dies, lacks capacity, or refuses to act, a substitute steps in. This prevents costly court applications to appoint an administrator. Name one to two substitutes in order of priority.

Example will clause: "I appoint my daughter Sarah Jones and my son David Jones as joint executors. If either is unable or unwilling to act, I appoint my brother Robert Smith as substitute executor."

Include executor removal clause cautiously. Some wills include clauses allowing beneficiaries to remove an executor by majority vote. Legal enforceability is uncertain in UK law. Courts may not enforce such clauses if they're contrary to the testator's presumed wishes. Professional legal advice is required for such clauses.

Consider professional executors for complex estates such as solicitors, accountants, or trust corporations. Benefits include expertise in estate administration, neutral third-party status avoiding family conflicts, professional indemnity insurance, and regulation by the Law Society or professional body. Drawbacks include expense, typically 3% to 5% of estate value or £200 or more per hour, less personal touch, and potential difficulty removing them as some charge penalties for early termination.

Use clear, updated wills because ambiguity leads to disputes. Update your will after major life events such as marriage, divorce, birth, or death of an executor. Use professional will services to ensure legal validity.

Communicate the executor role with your chosen person before appointing them. Ask if they're willing to serve. Explain what executor duties involve, estimated time commitment typically spanning six to 18 months, complexity of your estate, and beneficiaries they'll work with. Confirm they're comfortable with responsibilities.

Leave clear estate records to make the executor's job easier. Maintain an asset inventory listing bank accounts, property, investments, and debts. Document location of important documents such as deeds and insurance policies. Create a digital asset list with passwords and online accounts. Provide contact details for your solicitor, accountant, and financial advisor. Store these with your will or tell your executor where to find them.

According to Dutton Gregory, 49.5% of inheritance disputes in the UK involve siblings, often triggered by executor misconduct or perceived unfairness.

Choosing the right executor is one of the most important decisions in your will. With careful planning, you can avoid the costly, stressful process of executor removal that thousands of UK families face each year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can you remove an executor of a will in the UK?

A: Yes, an executor can be removed in the UK under Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985. The High Court has discretionary power to remove an executor if there are valid grounds such as fraud, incompetence, conflict of interest, failure to communicate, or actions contrary to the estate's best interests. The court's primary consideration is the welfare of the beneficiaries.

Q: What are valid grounds for removing an executor?

A: Valid grounds include criminal convictions for fraud or embezzlement, physical or mental incapacity, fraudulent behaviour, failure to communicate with beneficiaries, disobeying court orders, and self-dealing. The court requires solid evidence and will only remove an executor when continuation in office is detrimental to beneficiaries' interests.

Q: How much does it cost to remove an executor in the UK?

A: Costs range from £5,000 to £30,000 plus VAT depending on complexity. If the executor agrees to step down voluntarily, costs can be as low as £0 to £500 for a Deed of Renunciation. Contested cases with complex evidence typically cost £20,000 to £30,000. The losing party usually pays costs, though courts may order costs paid from the estate in some circumstances.

Q: Can an executor be removed after probate has been granted?

A: Yes, but it's more difficult. An application must be made to the High Court under Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985. The court requires compelling evidence that the executor's continuation in office is detrimental to beneficiaries. Cases like Lane v Lane [2024] show courts will remove executors post-grant for serious misconduct.

Q: Can an executor voluntarily step down?

A: Yes, if they haven't already obtained probate or intermeddled in the estate. They must sign a Deed of Renunciation using Form PA15 and file it with the Probate Registry. Once filed, renunciation is permanent and irrevocable. Alternatively, they can opt for power reserved, which allows them to step back but potentially return later.

Q: What is the citation procedure for removing an executor?

A: Citation is a non-contentious procedure used when an executor refuses to act or has intermeddled without applying for probate. Under the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987, interested parties can issue a citation requiring the executor to either accept or refuse the grant, or to take a grant if they've intermeddled. If they don't respond within the required timeframe, their rights as executor cease entirely.

Q: What does 'intermeddling' mean in executor removal?

A: Intermeddling occurs when someone acts as an executor without obtaining a grant of probate. This includes selling assets, paying debts, collecting money owed to the deceased, or carrying on their business. Once someone intermeddles, they become an executor de son tort and lose the right to renounce. They can be forced to take the grant via citation or face liability for their actions.

Conclusion

Removing a problematic executor in the UK is possible but requires careful consideration of costs, timing, and legal grounds.

Key takeaways:

  • Three removal pathways exist: voluntary resignation (£0-£500), citation procedure (£1,500-£5,000), and Section 50 court application (£10,000-£30,000+)
  • Valid grounds include fraud, incapacity, failure to communicate, conflict of interest, and breach of fiduciary duty—but personality conflicts alone aren't sufficient
  • Timing matters critically: removal before probate is easier and cheaper than removal after the grant has been issued
  • Citation procedures offer a faster, cheaper alternative to Section 50 applications when executors refuse to act or have intermeddled without taking a grant
  • Courts prioritise beneficiaries' welfare but respect the deceased's choice of executor, requiring compelling evidence of harm before removing executors

If you're facing a problematic executor, explore voluntary resignation and mediation before expensive litigation. If you're creating your own will, choose executors carefully, appoint multiple executors with clear roles, name substitutes, and communicate expectations before appointing anyone.

The executor disputes affecting thousands of UK families each year demonstrate why choosing the right executor matters as much as drafting your will correctly.

Need Help with Your Will?

Choosing the right executor now prevents the costly removal processes described above. By creating a clear, legally valid will with carefully selected executors and backup options, you protect your beneficiaries from future disputes and ensure smooth estate administration.

Create your will with confidence using WUHLD's guided platform. For just £99.99, you'll get your complete will (legally binding when properly executed and witnessed) plus three expert guides. Preview your will free before paying anything—no credit card required.

Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general information about executor removal in England and Wales and does not constitute legal or financial advice. WUHLD is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Every executor removal case depends on specific facts, evidence, and circumstances. Laws and court procedures change, and their application varies by situation. For advice about removing an executor in your specific circumstances, consult a qualified solicitor specializing in contentious probate. Court applications under Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 are complex and require professional legal representation. Cost estimates are indicative only and may vary significantly. Unless stated otherwise, information relates to England and Wales. Different rules apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Legal Disclaimer:

This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. WUHLD is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Laws and guidance change and their application depends on your circumstances. For advice about your situation, consult a qualified solicitor or regulated professional. Unless stated otherwise, information relates to England and Wales.

Sources: