Skip to main content
← Back to glossary

Undue Influence

Also known as: Coercion, Pressure, Improper Influence

Definition

Undue influence is coercion that overpowers a person's free will when making a will, forcing them to include provisions they would not otherwise have made but for that pressure.

Understanding undue influence is critical for protecting vulnerable individuals from manipulation and for distinguishing lawful family influence from unlawful coercion that can invalidate a will.


What Does Undue Influence Mean?

Under English and Welsh common law, undue influence means coercion that completely overpowers the testator's volition. The landmark case Wingrove v Wingrove [1885] established the foundational principle: "to be undue influence in the eye of the law there must be – to sum it up in one word – coercion." This coercion can take various forms including physical violence, verbal bullying, threats, manipulation, or sustained pressure that causes someone to comply "for quietness-sake" when seriously ill or vulnerable. The critical legal test is whether the testator was "led" (lawful influence) or "driven" (unlawful coercion). Crucially, there is NO presumption of undue influence in wills—unlike contract law principles from Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge [2001], actual coercion must always be proved, regardless of the relationship between testator and beneficiary.

The burden of proof is beyond reasonable doubt, akin to the criminal standard. Recent Court of Appeal guidance in Rea v Rea [2024] clarified that undue influence must be "more probable than any other hypothesis." Proving undue influence remains notoriously difficult—it typically occurs behind closed doors and the main witness (the testator) is deceased. Evidence must include witness testimony, correspondence showing manipulation, medical evidence of vulnerability or fearfulness, and patterns of controlling behaviour. Only a handful of cases succeed each decade.

Consider David, 82, who had moderate dementia and lived with his son James. James progressively limited David's contact with his daughter Sarah and remained present during will consultations. Medical records showed David was "fearful of upsetting James" and "would agree to anything for a quiet life." The court found undue influence—systematic isolation and medical evidence of fearfulness demonstrated coercion that overpowered David's free will. Contrast this with Margaret, 89, whose daughter Caroline had a "forceful personality" and frequently discussed inheritance. Despite Caroline's influence and Margaret's will changes favouring her, Rea v Rea [2024] found no undue influence. There was no evidence of threats or fearfulness—Margaret was "led" by Caroline's opinions but not "driven" against her will.

Undue influence differs from testamentary capacity. Capacity concerns mental ability (the Banks v Goodfellow test), while undue influence concerns external coercion. Someone can have full capacity yet still be coerced through manipulation or threats. Vulnerability factors—age, illness, dependency, isolation, cognitive decline—provide context for susceptibility but don't prove undue influence. Protective measures include independent legal advice, separate consultations without beneficiaries present, and documented reasons for decisions.


Common Questions

"What's the difference between influence and undue influence when someone makes a will?" Everyone is influenced by family relationships, gratitude, and advice—this is lawful. Undue influence means coercion that completely overpowers free will, forcing provisions the person genuinely doesn't want. The legal test is whether they were "led" (lawful) or "driven" (unlawful coercion).

"My elderly mother changed her will to leave everything to my brother who was her main carer—can I challenge it for undue influence?" Possibly, but the burden of proof is extremely high. You need clear evidence your brother coerced your mother—such as witness testimony of threats, evidence he isolated her, or medical evidence she was fearful. Simply being the carer who benefited is insufficient. Speak to a contentious probate solicitor to assess your evidence.

"How do you actually prove undue influence when the person who made the will has died?" Proving undue influence is notoriously difficult because it occurs privately and the testator can't give evidence. You need evidence showing facts more probable than any other explanation—witness testimony, correspondence showing manipulation, medical evidence of fearfulness, or patterns of controlling behaviour. Only a handful of cases succeed each decade.


Common Misconceptions

Myth: If someone persuaded or pressured my relative to change their will, that's undue influence and the will is invalid.

Reality: Persuasion, even strong persuasion, is not undue influence. The law requires proof of coercion that completely overpowered free will—the testator must have been "driven" rather than "led." Appeals to affection, persistent requests, or badgering do not constitute undue influence unless they completely dominate the testator's volition.

Myth: Because there's a presumption of undue influence in certain relationships, it's easier to prove with family members or carers.

Reality: There is NO presumption of undue influence in wills, regardless of the relationship. This differs from contract law (Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge) where presumed undue influence can apply. You must prove actual coercion beyond reasonable doubt—the burden never shifts. The relationship might provide context for vulnerability, but creates no legal presumption.


Understanding undue influence connects to these related concepts:

  • Testamentary Capacity: Separate but related—capacity concerns mental ability to make a will, while undue influence concerns external coercion overpowering free will.
  • Will: The legal document whose validity may be challenged on grounds of undue influence.
  • Contesting Will: Undue influence is one of several grounds for legally challenging a will's validity.
  • Fraud: A distinct ground for invalidity involving deliberate deception, sometimes alleged alongside undue influence.
  • Vulnerable Person: Individuals at higher risk of undue influence due to age, illness, dependency, or isolation.

  • What Makes a Will Invalid in the UK?: Undue influence is one of several grounds for invalidating a will—learn about all the ways a will can be challenged.
  • Testamentary Capacity: Proving You're "Of Sound Mind": Understand the difference between lacking mental capacity and being coerced, and how reduced capacity can increase vulnerability.
  • Undue Influence When Making a Will: The comprehensive guide covering warning signs, case law, protective measures, and how to challenge a will.
  • How to Make a Will If You Have Dementia: Learn protective measures for vulnerable individuals with cognitive decline who are at heightened risk of undue influence.

Need Help with Your Will?

Creating your will with proper safeguards protects your wishes and gives your family peace of mind. WUHLD's platform guides you through every decision with clear explanations and legal accuracy.

Create your will with confidence using WUHLD's guided platform. For just £99.99, you'll get your complete, legally binding will plus three expert guides. Preview your will free before paying anything—no credit card required.


Legal Disclaimer: This glossary entry provides general information about UK legal terminology and does not constitute legal advice. Undue influence claims are highly fact-specific and legally complex. For advice about your specific situation, including whether you have grounds to challenge a will or how to protect a vulnerable person from potential undue influence, consult a qualified solicitor specializing in contentious probate or will disputes.